红壤侵蚀区不同植被恢复模式土壤有机碳含量、密度及储量分布特征

Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon in different vegetation restoration patterns in red soil erosion areas

来源:中文会议(科协)
中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]为了明确红壤侵蚀区不同植被恢复模式土壤有机碳的分布特征。[方法]以经过 27年植被恢复与重建后的 6种林分为研究对象,以未加人工干扰的自然恢复地为对照,设置 20×20 m的标准样地,采集 0~10 cm、10~20 cm、20~30 cm和 30~40 cm土层的土壤样品,测定其有机碳含量、土壤容重等理化性质,探究红壤侵蚀区土壤有机碳含量及有机碳密度的分布特征。[结果](1)对比自然恢复地,6种人工植被恢复模式的SOC含量均显著增加(p<0.05),在不同人工植被恢复模式之间 0~20 cm 土层的SOC含量也存在显著差异(p<0.05),表现为木荷纯林>湿地松木荷混交林>湿地松补植木荷>马尾松补植木荷>湿地松纯林>马尾松纯林,20~40 cm土层的SOC含量则无显著差异。(2)研究区7种植被恢复模式不同土层的土壤有机碳含量分布规律基本一致,均随着土壤深度的增加SOC含量呈现减少的趋势,但不同植被恢复模式SOC减少的幅度不同,其中木荷纯林减少的幅度最大,自然恢复地减少的幅度最小。(3)土壤有机碳密度变化规律与土壤有机碳含量变化规律基本一致(r=0.978,p<0.01,皮尔逊双尾检验),土壤含水率、容重、孔隙度和全氮对土壤有机碳有显著影响。(4)在研究区 85.85 hm2范围内 0~40 cm土层有机碳储量为 7317.87 Mg C,其中湿地松木荷混交林土壤有机碳储量最大,为 1840.58 Mg C,马尾松补植木荷林土壤有机碳储量最小,为 432.97 Mg C。[结论]对比自然恢复,人工植被恢复与重建在红壤侵蚀区效果显著,在研究区今后的建设中应优先选择木荷等优势树种进而增强土壤固碳能力。

[Objective]To clarify the distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon in different vegetation restoration modes in the red soil erosion area.[Method]Taking six types of forest stands after 27 years of artificial vegetation restoration and reconstruction as the research objects,and natural restoration sites without artificial disturbance were used as controls.20×20 m standard sample plots were set up,and soil samples were collected from 0~10 cm,10~20 cm,20~30 cm,and 30~40 cm soil layers to determine their organic carbon content,soil capacity,and other physicochemical properties to investigate the distribution characteristics in the red soil erosion area,and to estimate the carbon storage capacity of soil layers in the study area.[Result](1)Compared with the natural restoration site,the SOC content of all six artificial vegetation restoration modes increased significantly(p<0.05),and the SOC content of the 0~20 cm soil layer also differed significantly(p<0.05)among the different artificial vegetation restoration modes,which showed that SS>MES>RES>RMS>PE>PM.There was no significant difference in SOC content in the 20~40 cm soil layer.(2)The distribution patterns of soil organic carbon content in different soil layers of the seven vegetation restoration modes in the study area were basically the same,and all showed a trend of decreasing SOC content with increasing soil depth,but the magnitude of SOC reduction in different vegetation restoration modes was different,among which the magnitude of reduction was the largest in the pure forest of Schima superba and the smallest in the natural restoration site.(3)The pattern of change in soil organic carbon density was generally consistent with the pattern of change in soil organic carbon content(r = 0.978,p<0.01,Pearson two-tailed test).Soil moisture content,bulk density,porosity and total nitrogen had significant effects on soil organic carbon.(4)The organic carbon stock in the 0~40 cm soil layer within 85.85 hm2 of the study area was 7317.87 Mg C.The largest organic carbon stock was 1840.58 Mg C in the MES,and the smallest organic carbon stock was 432.97 Mg C in the RMS.[Conclusion]Artificial vegetation restoration and rehabilitation are effective in red soil erosion areas,and in the future construction of the study area,preference should be given to dominant tree species such as mullein in order to enhance soil carbon sequestration capacity.

李鹏;刘晓君;刘苑秋;陶凌剑;付小斌;毛梦蕾;李文琴;汪晨;

江西农业大学/鄱阳湖流域森林生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,南昌 330045##江西省森林培育重点实验室,南昌 330045;宁夏大学农学院,银川 750021;江西省森林培育重点实验室,南昌 330045##江西省森林培育重点实验室,南昌 330045;江西农业大学/鄱阳湖流域森林生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,南昌 330045##江西省森林培育重点实验室,南昌 330045;江西农业大学/鄱阳湖流域森林生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,南昌 330045##江西省森林培育重点实验室,南昌 330045;江西农业大学/鄱阳湖流域森林生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,南昌 330045##江西省森林培育重点实验室,南昌 330045;江西农业大学/鄱阳湖流域森林生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,南昌 330045##江西省森林培育重点实验室,南昌 330045;江西农业大学/鄱阳湖流域森林生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,南昌 330045##江西省森林培育重点实验室,南昌 330045;

第八届中国林业学术大会

S714.2

红壤侵蚀区 植被恢复 碳密度 分布特征 土壤固碳

Red soil erosion area vegetation restoration carbon density distribution characteristics Soil carbon sequestration

707-718 / 12

评论

上述内容所涉观点、意见仅代表作者,与国家学术会议平台无关。

国家学术会议平台已取得上述相关成果授权,未经允许,任何单位和个人不得转载、复制或用作他途,一经发现,相关法律后果自行承担,国家学术会议平台保留向相关侵权人依法追究法律责任的权利。